FAILURE TO DEFEND UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS IS THE
FAILURE OF THE ENTIRE SUHAKAM COMMISSION, NOT ONLY
THE CHAIR
CSO Platform for Reform deplores the views of the current SUHAKAM
Chair, Rahmat Mohamad, that ‘human rights is human rights’ when
asked about concerns that adopting a Malaysian context may sideline
vulnerable groups, particularly the LGBTQ community. However, he also
emphasised that the commission’s role is to uphold human rights in a
local context (“acuan tempatan”), which in our view is both appalling
and regressive.
It is due to this “acuan tempatan” that we are suffering on so many
fronts; and it would not be surprising if SUHAKAM loses its Paris
Principles compliance Grade A status, and loses its international
standing.
Trying to reframe human rights into an “acuan tempatan” should never
be the task of SUHAKAM as most politicians would love this narrow and
dangerous definition for rights of people in Malaysia. The task of
SUHAKAM is to upgrade the protection and promotion of human rights
in Malaysia following the interpretation in Federal Constitution Part 2 on
fundamental liberties and the universal standards of human rights
accepted internationally.
On 3 July last year, CSO Platform issued a statement citing fears that the
reputation of SUHAKAM would be undermined by a team of weak
commissioners, as a majority of the newly appointed human rights
commissioners did not inspire confidence that they would be able to
uphold human rights in the country. A year on, unfortunately our fears
have come true. Recently, the Chair has been urged by NGOs locally
and internationally to go on garden leave pending an inquiry against
him concerning allegations of power abuse and racism.
The Commission is designed as a collegial decision-making process.
The Chair does not have veto power and should never be allowed to do
so. The failure of the other Commissioners to speak up on the skewed
position of the Chair only can mean that this Commission as a whole
fails in its duty to defend human rights as a universal concept for all
peoples in Malaysia. It is incumbent on each Commissioner appointed
by the Agong to state his/her position on the predicament created by
the Chair and enabled by a silent set of Commissioners.
CSO Platform for Reform, a coalition of more than 60 NGOs, reiterates our call for reform as
follows:
A transparent and independent process of appointing the Commissioners.
We urge
the Madani government to devise an independent process of appointing SUHAKAM
commissioners, whose appointments are currently made through the Prime Minister’s
Department,
We call on Dato’ Seri Azalina Othman Said, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s
Department (Law and Institutional Reform) and the Legal Affairs Division of the Prime
Minister’s Department (BHEUU) to look into the reforms that have been proposed, as well
as to look into the request of SUHAKAM staff to investigate their chairman;
We call on the other Commissioners to state their position on this issue; do they
uphold human rights principles as outlined in the UDHR;
We call for honesty and reflection, that if the incumbent Commissioners feel that they
are unable to adhere to and uphold the human rights principles as outlined in the UDHR and
in SUHAKAM’s mandate, and insist on “acuan tempatan” approach, then they should
consider resigning their positions; and
We would also like to call for more inclusive and effective consultations on institutional reform with the civil society.
We would like to remind the current SUHAKAM Commissioners that they have a duty to
uphold human rights in line with the United Nations’ Universal Declaration on Human Rights
and the Federal Constitution Part 2 on fundamental liberties as an independent oversight
empowered national institution. This is important if we are to check on the government to
ensure it continues to play its primary duty and obligation in realising human rights for all.